Add FSiC2026 presentation materials for OpenROAD MCP#39
Open
Conversation
- Conference abstract (~100 words) with compelling hook - Presenter script with timing guide (~7-8 min + Q&A) - HTML slides with company logos - Logo assets for Precision Innovations and OpenROAD Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThree new presentation files have been added for the Free Silicon Conference 2026: an abstract document, a comprehensive speaker script with timing and Q&A guidance, and a static HTML presentation deck with 14 slides covering OpenROAD MCP's capabilities and workflows. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
presentation/FSiC2026_OpenROAD_MCP_Script.txt (1)
166-167: Qualify hard metrics unless you can cite measured data.Line 166 and Lines 245-247 use precise figures (coverage/overhead/latency). If these are not backed by published measurements, soften wording (e.g., “high test coverage”, “low overhead in internal testing”) to avoid credibility issues during Q&A.
Suggested wording adjustment
-And fifth, it's production-ready with over 80% test coverage. +And fifth, it's production-ready with strong automated test coverage. -A4: Minimal. The async architecture and circular buffers keep overhead under - 5% for typical workloads. Session creation takes about 100-200ms. +A4: Minimal in our internal testing. The async architecture and circular + buffers keep overhead low for typical workloads, and session creation is + typically fast.Also applies to: 245-247
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@presentation/FSiC2026_OpenROAD_MCP_Script.txt` around lines 166 - 167, The sentence "And fifth, it's production-ready with over 80% test coverage." (and the precise figures on lines 245-247 referring to overhead/latency) uses hard metrics without cited measurements; replace those exact numbers with qualified language (e.g., "high test coverage", "low overhead in internal testing", or "sub-10ms median latency in our internal benchmarks") unless you can add a citation or footnote to measured data—update the phrases containing "over 80% test coverage" and the overhead/latency claims accordingly to either provide a source or use softer, non-numeric wording.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@presentation/slides.html`:
- Line 286: The slides contain a stale placeholder URL
"github.com/your-repo/openroad-mcp" (appearing at the literal text on Line 286
and again at Lines 322–324); replace those placeholder links with the actual
repository URL and verify that the docs/site link referenced on Line 323 points
to the live documentation site (update it if necessary). Search the HTML for the
exact string "github.com/your-repo/openroad-mcp" and replace all occurrences,
and then click/test the updated docs URL to confirm it resolves before
committing.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@presentation/FSiC2026_OpenROAD_MCP_Script.txt`:
- Around line 166-167: The sentence "And fifth, it's production-ready with over
80% test coverage." (and the precise figures on lines 245-247 referring to
overhead/latency) uses hard metrics without cited measurements; replace those
exact numbers with qualified language (e.g., "high test coverage", "low overhead
in internal testing", or "sub-10ms median latency in our internal benchmarks")
unless you can add a citation or footnote to measured data—update the phrases
containing "over 80% test coverage" and the overhead/latency claims accordingly
to either provide a source or use softer, non-numeric wording.
ℹ️ Review info
Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: bc3f758f-8400-4c1b-ba1c-40256aa5b064
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
presentation/openroad_logo.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpresentation/precision_favicon.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpresentation/precision_logo.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
presentation/FSiC2026_OpenROAD_MCP_Abstract.mdpresentation/FSiC2026_OpenROAD_MCP_Script.txtpresentation/slides.html
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner
Author
|
@CodeRabbit pause |
✅ Actions performedReviews paused. |
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…D logo [skip ci] Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…demo [skip ci] - Add page numbers (X / 14) to all slides - Update GitHub URL to github.com/luarss/openroad-mcp - Remove non-existent readthedocs link - Fix license to Apache 2.0 - Remove "first MCP server for EDA" claim - Rewrite Use Cases with actual GCD timing demo case study Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Use actual uvx-based install command from README instead of incorrect pip Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…skip ci] - Move all FSiC2026 presentation files from presentation/ to demo/fsic2026/ - Update orfs-gcd-timing README with correct paths and verified metrics - Confirmed timing demo works: 0.46ns fails (WNS -0.05ns), 0.52ns passes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit